The data is encrypted locally before it is send to the storage servers in the internet. Luckily a quick google search revealed that there are a couple of interesting options available:Īll of those offer encrypted backups. How much do I have to pay for how many gigabytes? How redundant is my data stored and is it checked for data integrity? I don’t want to hand over my precious data to some company without strong and secure encryption and by that I mean that nobody but me should ever be able to get my data. Of course, the first question that comes to mind is privacy and security in general. So what are the alternatives? After coming to the conclusion that I actually don’t want a NAS device I thought about online backup services. This is why I think that those NAS solutions are not right for me. One final disadvantage of all those »local« backup solutions is that I have to be home to run my backups but I also want to backup when I’m at work or somewhere entirely different. Besides the costs for the hardware and the time of setting everything up, there are also some costs for power as this machine would have to run 24/7/365. It would still be no real offsite backup, it could still suffer from hardware failure or theft. Modern filesystem with data integrity checks, fileserver and file sharing capabilities and Time Machine compatibility.īut again, with hard drives included it wouldn’t be cheap. It comes with a nice interface and offers everything I would need. I thought about using FreeNAS as I like FreeBSD and it uses the ZFS as filesystem. #Crashplan freebsd windowsThey usually come with Microsoft Windows Server and require some time investment to get going. These are basically small Atom powered PCs with four HDD slots and no display connector. Then I thought about buying an ✺cer Aspire easyStore H341« or an »HP ProLiant – MicroServer« and building my own custom NAS. To be fair, these stories are one ore two years old. On the other side they are quite expensive, most of them are ugly, they use Filesystems like Ext3/4 or HFS+ and I also heard real horror stories of complete data losses especially with Drobo. On the one side they offer lots of nice features like Time Machine compatibility, web interfaces, fileserver and file sharing features. I really don’t like the consumer plastic boxes like the Drobo, Qnap and Synology products. The other option I considered was buying a NAS. When I buy something like a network attached storage I would also want to use it as a fileserver and other things and Time Capsule just doesn’t offer this kind of flexibility. If thats not correct please leave a comment. As far as I know there are also no checks for data integrity so if some bits flip on the disk you never know. Only one drive also means no data redundancy. You can attach a recovery disk but that just makes it a little better. I don’t like Time Capsule because it is just one drive in a plastic box with no direct access to the hard disk or the files. This would allow me to back up over the air with no wires and drives lying around on my desk. My setup could be vastly improved by using a NAS or Apples Time Capsule. This is still better than no backup but it requires me to connect my drives regularly to my computer. Over the years I’ve collected quite a few drives and with every new drive I get more annoyed by the pile they form on my desk. That is all quite nice but not an optimal solution. With OS X 10.7 (Lion) Time Machine will add local snapshots for the time I’m not connected to my backup drive and it will write those snapshots to the backup drive once I connect it again. Current SetupĬurrently I’m using an USB / SATA adaptor to connect various hard drives without enclosure to my computer to run Time Machine semi automatic backups. #Crashplan freebsd manualYears after several hard drive crashes, after manual backups and semi automatic backups I’m still thinking about the right solution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |